Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Welk

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was removed. Please do not modify it.

Welk

(1 Inq/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. --Harrar 23:53, 17 October 2007 (GMT)
  2. Inqvote Perhaps a pic of the Shadow Academy? Thefourdotelipsis 23:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. From the tentatively pounded desk of Four Dot
    • Things like "However, there appears to be no direct evidence" do not belong. Adopt a better tone, please.
    • "almost certainly" - Weasel words. "Possibly" is better.
    • That's all. Thefourdotelipsis 11:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
      • Think I've addressed all of those but act at your disgression -- Harrar 23:53, 17 October 2007 (GMT)
  2. From the squalid cubicle of Graestan:
    • Please go over the entire article and make sure the wording, sentence structure, and general flow are correct.
    • Speculative information should be removed and either placed in the BtS, footnotes, or left out entirely. "Partnership with Lomi Plo" in particular needs to be reworked.
    • Article needs to be relinked. Either one link for the whole thing, or one each for the intro and article. Either style is fine, if consistent. All applicable links should be added to images.
    • Quotes are either inappropriately placed or overly explained. Also, do not include a period in quote attribution.
    • File:ShadowAcademy.jpg should be cropped and reuploaded; I'm fine with losing negligible portions of the edge of the station in order to get rid of the hair.
    • Please go into more detail about the Mission to Myrkr, including more background of the strike team's mission.
    • BedaGorog could use an article. Do you know enough about it to create one? If so, please do. If not, explain here.
    • —Graestan Jedi Order (This party's over) 01:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • In my defence, should anyone think I deleted them, the templates at the bottom of the page were already gone when I put this nom up!Harrar 23:53, 17 October 2007 (GMT)
  • I'm going to remove the nom because it seems quite a lot of work needs to go into Welk before he's up to scratch. Also the Inferno info on him was too hazy and appears quite contradictory with the SBS material. Also I don't think I've written the article particularly well. So hopefully Welk will be FA a short while after Invincible, when his story's tied up. Sorry, and obviously others can work on it if they want!Harrar 16:27, 31 October 2007 (GMT)