Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/User:Jasca Ducato/Mickey Suttle admits

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

He admits

1. Jasca Ducato 09:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
2. Roron Corobb 17:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC) (im 60-40 on this one) but I think it would be good for the star wars community
3. Kuralyov 21:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Objections

1. Ahahahaha greatness. But no for featured article. —MarcK [talk] 11:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
2. See below. Adamwankenobi^{Talk to me! My home.} 22:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
3. Cull Tremayne 05:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
4. A quote for a featured article? No, thanks. Uncyclopedia occasionally pulls pranks like this, but we're serious. - Sikon [Talk] 05:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
5. No proof it's true - Kwenn 11:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
6. No, nor will it ever be for as long as I'm an admin who has any say. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
7. Strong object, see comments. RMF 14:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
8. Somebodys gotta do something about this guy like send something to Lucasfilm. - Roron Corobb 14:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
9. Darth Kevinmhk 03:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
10. <Neimoidian voice>"I object! There is no proof!"</Neimoidian voice> —Silly Dan _(talk) 03:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
11. SFH 04:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
12. This is a better candidate for VFD than FA. - Breathesgelatin 22:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
13. No, not for a FA. —Mirlen 01:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments

• This should definately be on the main page, it would cut the fanon down by at least 80%. Jasca Ducato 09:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• I dont know if it would cut it down by that much but I would say at least somewhere around 50-75% because a lot of fanon is inspired by supershadow (a.k.a. Mickey Suttle). Making this a featured article would say to the star wars community: It is all over, Mickey Suttle's lies have stopped once and for all. 17:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC) Roron Corobb
• We had SuperShadow itself as a featured article a while back. It did cut fanon down for a few weeks, but the only lasting impression it made was a feeling of nausea when we saw the main page. -- SFH 22:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• I don't think it should be a featured article, but maybe it could go in our "Quote of the Week" box on the main page. Adamwankenobi^{Talk to me! My home.} 22:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • No thanks. I think most of the attention is due to the fact of this unnecessary hatred against the guy. He's no more of a threat than the people who try to publish their Star Wars fanfiction. Okay, so much of his "info" has been relentlessly added to the wiki, but along with that has come more informed star wars fans who discover that his stuff is false. Seriously this would happen someday, why bring more attention to this lying scumbag than to any other disruptive force on the Internet of all places? Cull Tremayne 05:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
    • There's no proof this comment actually comes from Suttle. It's on MySpace, which is a breeding ground for people pretending to be other people. It uses the same image we have here, and an apology just doesn't strike me as something Suttle would do. Also, one of his friends is a guy posing as George Lucas. Added to that, SS.com is still up and running with its usual garbage - Kwenn 11:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• 1) Like others have said, we have no way to verify this, so it could very well be an imposter (as it most likely is). 2) Even if it was genuine, articles like this (i.e. verbatim quotes) have no place as FAs. RMF 14:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• I just checked SS.com and hes stil doing his fake stuff so I remove my support. It is probably fake because on his website he will never tell anyone his name or stuff so why would he do it on Myspace.com, so the whole thing was probably someone who pretended to be him.Roron Corobb 14:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • He did post his email address, mickeysuttle@yahoo.com, once on SS.com, but later removed it. - Sikon [Talk] 04:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)