Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Universal Day of the Jedi

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Universal Day of the Jedi

Support

  1. CGt2099 10:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Objections

  1. Definitely not. Not even close to the standard we expect from a FA, in so many ways. Atarumaster88 (Audience Chamber) 17:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. You're kidding me. .... 23:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. ... ummm... what? Jorrel Fraajic Wiki-shrinkable 00:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  4. So... this *is* a joke, isn't it? -- Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 03:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  5. Poor quality of writing, and not up to standards. —Xwing328(Talk) 04:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  1. Low standard and a short article -NighthawkLeader 01:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Judging by the above comments, I owe you guys an apology for nominating this article. I am still new to the wiki thing. Perhaps you could offer suggestions for improvement, or what types of articles to look for? Judging from FA history, you guys tend to focus mainly on in-universe articles, as opposed to real-world topics. Any reasons for this? I would appreciate some solid feedback as I would like to become a further contributor to Wookieepedia. Thanks. cGt 2099 02:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. Well, it's not so much about in-universe topics as it is quality of articles. If you look at some other articles either in the queue, the Archives, or even some trying to reach FA status, you will get a good idea of what is looked for in a FA. Jorrel Fraajic Wiki-shrinkable 03:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • There is a nice list of criterion for a Featured Article at the top of this page, and that's generally what we look for. Real-world topics are great, but most of our previous FAs have been IU just because they tend to get more attention. Atarumaster88 (Audience Chamber) 03:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)