- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Tsoklo
- Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 20:54, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: The Rebel's Rodian (Not Tseebo) (With contributions from AV-6R7, Tsoklo's biggest fan)
(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
- As contributor. Let us toast spicebrew in honor of Tsoklo. - AV-6R7User talk:AV-6R7 21:01, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
Object
- I posted this objection when the article Jho was nominated, and I'm afraid I'll have to post it again here. It's not one that I can strike without some significant convincing. The objection is based on the FA requirements, which say that an article must, "following the review process, be stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars." Tsoklo is a recurring character in Star Wars Rebels and it stands to reason that he will continue to make appearances here and there. That means there can be multiple instances throughout the next season, as well as via book releases, that will require this article to be constantly updated. No single author/nominator can guarantee that they'll continue to be around to work on the article, and there's no guarantee that anyone else will necessarily update it either. And even if it was updated, there's no guarantee that the updates will be of sufficient quality to maintain the article's FA status. Because of that, this article is at risk of one day becoming a Former Featured Article, and I think it's best that we avoid nominations with that risk. I would encourage you (and everyone) not to nominate characters from Star Wars Rebels. Unlike events, which are mostly confined to one or two episodes, characters are recurring and will constantly need upkeep. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 21:04, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
- Good job on the article, though! Should've said that in my previous comment - I don't want my objection to be taken as a shot at the article's quality or overall worthiness to be made a status article. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 21:05, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
- I had considered this issue, actually. But I was also making the assumption that I, or someone, could be stuck trying to keep the quality up week to week (which is admittedly insane), especially seeing that it's possible that Tsoklo may take quite some time to bring up to status, possibly by the start of Season 2 which would cause issues everywhere. Damn. It's an excellent point, though. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:11, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
- I assumed this was going to be taken down, then? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:48, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
- I had considered this issue, actually. But I was also making the assumption that I, or someone, could be stuck trying to keep the quality up week to week (which is admittedly insane), especially seeing that it's possible that Tsoklo may take quite some time to bring up to status, possibly by the start of Season 2 which would cause issues everywhere. Damn. It's an excellent point, though. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:11, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
- Good job on the article, though! Should've said that in my previous comment - I don't want my objection to be taken as a shot at the article's quality or overall worthiness to be made a status article. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 21:05, March 23, 2015 (UTC)