Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/The Dark Lords of the Sith

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

The Dark Lords of the Sith

  • Nominated by: —Tommy 9281 04:27, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:…or some such nonsense.

(4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote Pre-nom reviewed. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 04:35, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Awesome stuff, Tommy. Someone should have told the curator not to underestimate the Force.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 21:57, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Chack Jadson (Talk) 22:00, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Excellent. Thefourdotelipsis 13:25, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Grunny (talk) 00:16, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:48, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Interesting choice of subject! I hope to see more along the same vein in the future. --Imperialles 02:25, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Chack
  • "The exhibit appears to be complete, with display cases housing the various Sith artifacts for all to see. In the audio drama, the museum curator states that the exhibit is "not quite ready yet."" Couldn't he have been referring to the lighting and such? If that's the case, then there's no contradiction. Chack Jadson (Talk) 14:41, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
    • Are you suggesting that I remove that bit?—Tommy 9281 15:59, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
      • Yes. Chack Jadson (Talk) 16:03, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
        • Cool, I wasn't sure. It's been taken care of, and thanks for the review. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy 9281 18:14, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
L'Imperialles
  • In the "Description" section you refer to the museum as the "Museum of Dark Side Antiquities," but in "History" you switch to referring to it as the Galactic Museum. I realize the sources themselves are inconsistent, but suddenly switching between the terms with no explanation until the BTS is a little confusing. I'd say to go for consistency in this case.
    • Addressed.
  • Otherwise excellent as usual. --Imperialles 02:01, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review, Imp. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy 9281 02:19, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Redemption has been contacted regarding the infobox image, and I am confident that it will be rescanned long before this makes it to the main page.—Tommy 9281 04:27, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Regarding the title of the exhibit: is it italicized and quotation marked in the comic? If not, it seems a bit excessive. I am not sure what the proper formatting for a museum exhibit is, but I'll look into it. --Imperialles 13:14, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
    • Okay, it appears there is no established standard. Carry on! :P --Imperialles 13:18, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
      • Yeah I wasn't sure about it myself & after doing it I also felt it looked a bit excessive. But since it was the name of the exhibit, I figured it should be italicized. If we determine later that it is indeed unnecessary, I have no problems fixing it.—Tommy 9281 13:36, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
      • Either way, sometimes in the article the name has italics + quotation marks, sometimes it has just italics; whatever way you decided to do it, it should be internally consistent. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 17:16, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
        • You are correct. I've taken care of that now, thanks for bringing it to my attention.—Tommy 9281 18:18, June 24, 2010 (UTC)