Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Record Time

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Record Time

Support

  1. Well, I did write it. And I mean that in the most literal sense. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 07:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. .... 08:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Well played. —ATATatarismall.png 12:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Jorrel Wiki-shrinkable Fraajic 22:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. jSarek 01:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Lord Hydronium 03:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. --Eyrezer 07:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Birt needs to be integrated into the history, not put off in her own "masters" section out of chronological order. Havac 20:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. As per Havac. Other than that, I will support. --Eyrezer 05:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Previous objection met. But this is still far too short. This is what Good Articles are for. I simply can't support an article this short for FA when there's an entire system designed to recognize good-but-short articles like this. Havac 22:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Stricken by Imperialles. Not a rules-based objection.
    • If I may say so, the article and intro (not including BTS) is 1060 words long. That's longer than some other articles that have been placed here (TBT, etc). And this objection isn't rules-based yet anyways. Atarumaster88 02:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Approved by Inquisitorius - Wookieepedia:Inq/Record Time 20:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Objections to lack of pictures will be stricken. There aren't any. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 07:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • One redlink, can you clear that up? Cull Tremayne 07:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Redlink eliminated. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Audience Chamber) 22:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Apparently, a single-source nom that's not from the KotOR era, Marvel, or Ewoks doesn't get many votes. :-( Atarumaster88 22:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Your "poor me!" routine isn't going to get you votes! Oh, wait, it just did. Looks good, given what you had to work with. jSarek 01:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)