- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Plooz
- Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 09:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Plooz.
(5 Inqs/0 Users/5 Total)
Support
He's lovably dumb, and can time travel. More Inq must read this. Greyman@wikia(Talk) 02:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)- -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 14:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Struck my objection on the battleship thing. Don't want to see a repeat of the Nagai fleet naming fiesta. :-P Atarumaster88
(Talk page) 23:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC) - -- Darth Culator (Talk) 03:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Lord Hydronium 12:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
No lead quote. Also, in the quote for the "Return" section, the all caps "FATHER" seems odd, since comics are in all caps anyway. Please advise. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)- Lead quote inserted, and it's in capitals since the word "father" is significantly in the comic, despite being in the bubble as the preceding words. So the capitals are to mimic that extra emphasis. Thefourdotelipsis 23:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'd prefer bolding and italicizing, or something, instead, but it doesn't really matter. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Lead quote inserted, and it's in capitals since the word "father" is significantly in the comic, despite being in the bubble as the preceding words. So the capitals are to mimic that extra emphasis. Thefourdotelipsis 23:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- From the desk of Atarumaster88
Needs a link to those "battleships" you mention.- Hmm. That's meant to be more a general term, rather than referring to any specific class. At any rate those ships aren't identified...what exactly do you want me to link to?
You mention a fractured dialect. Is it stated of what language?- Fraid not.
- Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating day. Atarumaster88 (Talk page) 19:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Danke. Thefourdotelipsis 23:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Toprawa:
This is kind of OR. I'd rather see this "inaccurate" claim placed in the ref note instead of the way it is asserted. "Though the [[Astromech droid/Legends|astromech droid]]'s calculations were inaccurate,<ref name="conf">The events of [[Ewoks (Marvel)|''Ewoks'']] occur within the same twenty years in between ''[[Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi]]'' and ''[[Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith]]'' as the ''[[Star Wars: Droids (Marvel)|Star Wars: Droids]]'' series</ref>"Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)- It's not really OR...and it's not an interpretation. It's something that has retroactively been shown as, well, impossible. Since much of the bio is about time travel, I think it's fairly important to establish in the text that this is most certainly not 100 years. Thefourdotelipsis 08:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wookieepedia:Attribution#No_original_research says that one "may make straightforward mathematical calculations or logical deductions". It is locked in now that they can travel no more than 25 years. Artoo says they travel 100 years. His calculations cannot be correct. Therefore, they are incorrect. -- Ozzel 00:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's not really OR...and it's not an interpretation. It's something that has retroactively been shown as, well, impossible. Since much of the bio is about time travel, I think it's fairly important to establish in the text that this is most certainly not 100 years. Thefourdotelipsis 08:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 12:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)