Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Philo/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Philo

  • Nominated by: CC7567 (talk) 11:57, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: How on earth did he get over 1,000 words? He only had two lines! :/

(5 Inqs/1 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:46, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 23:48, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:23, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote --Eyrezer 10:42, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote 1358 (Talk) 13:00, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:45, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Floyd:
  • A little context on the Enhanced Privacy Invasion Bill would be useful in the intro.
  • Again in the body. What did it entail?
    • We don't know, unfortunately. From the title, we could assume that it's something to do with the privacy issues created by Palpatine toward the end of the war, like the Enhanced Security and Enforcement Act, but in the end we don't know. The title could just as well be a misnomer. In both cases in the intro and body, it's described as legislation, which should be sufficient as the only known info about it. To supplement the context any further would be overdoing it.
  • Not an objection per se: do you think Philo's coalition is significant enough to warrant an article?
    • Not really. It's basically just several senators who get together based on their common stance on the matter. The article mostly presents it that way as a group of senators, not necessarily the official kind of organization that might entail an article.
  • That's all. Good work. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:24, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review. CC7567 (talk) 01:06, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 09:45, November 30, 2011 (UTC)


  • Yeah, he's currently just barely over the word count requirement at 1,072 words. Don't know how that happened. CC7567 (talk) 11:57, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • I switched one "him" to "Philo" in a sentence that included three instances of "his" and one of "him" to make it clearer. Hope that's okay. 1358 (Talk) 13:00, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
    • Sure, that's fine. CC7567 (talk) 00:53, November 22, 2011 (UTC)