Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Onaconda Farr

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Onaconda Farr

  • Nominated by: Kilson Likes PIE 13:41, 04 July 09 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I don't even attempt to keep up with CC anymore. :P

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total/INQCON 1)

Support

Object

  1. The Bts is pretty minimal at the moment, and structured oddly. Provide more information about his first movie appearance - who played him etc - and then provide more info on the retcon, such as who played him in the earlier film (if such info is available.) --Eyrezer 06:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
    • I have restructured the Bts and put new and updated information in. However, I had to remove Episode 1 retcon part because it was false. Previously, another user tried to GA this article and put the retcon in. I thought it was correct, but when I tried to find it on the HoloNet website, I could not. I was finally able to get in touch with the user (he was banned, making it slightly difficult to find him) it turned out that he had mistaken some text on the website for a retcon. I am now trying to confirm whether Farr truly did appear in Cloak of Deception and Acts of War. Kilson Likes PIE 15:35, 27 July 09 (UTC)
      • Just as an update to this issue, I am also no searching to see if there is any evidence to suggest Farr appeared in these sources. I will have the answer within the next few days, hopefully. Darth Trayus Sith Emblem (Trayus Academy) 07:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
  2. I had gone through each section and fixed typos and spelling errors. There were quite a large number of them. I'll give the article a more-thorough read-through here in a lil bit, see if there is anything else that needs addressed. As far as the spelling goes, though, that's taken care of. Trak Nar Ramble on 04:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
    • Oh, concerning the "Cute_Ono" pic with the clone stamped panel removal and missing trophy head... I redrew in the missing trophy head and the missing portion of the fireplace, matching Katie's linework as closely as I could. For the time being, I uploaded it under a different name and tossed it in my Garage if you wanna use it. I didn't replace the pic as the swamp slug head and fireplace ended up being largely guesswork. But it's available if you think it's worth using. Trak Nar Ramble on 03:53, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
      • I love it. I'm perfectly comfortable with using it, so long as the Inqery permits it as not overly adjusted from the original. Darth Trayus Sith Emblem (Trayus Academy) 22:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
  3. The clone attacks a senator
    • "Farr summoned long-time friend Senator Padmé Amidala of Naboo to Rodia, so that the Naboo senator was abducted and handed over to Trade Federation Viceroy Nute Gunray." Please reword this. It's poor wording overall.
      • Reworded basically the entire intro.
    • Throughout the article, there's a lot of Farr's views on different acts and movements in the article, but they all lack defined outcomes. They're relevant; please add them in.
    • Is it specifically mentioned as an "Army of the Republic"?
      • No, and fixed.
    • It'll have to stop there for now. One thing I noticed, however, is that there are still numerous minor errors that you could have caught by now. If you're going to take over this nomination, Trayus, I would suggest giving it a copyedit yourself to make sure it's up to your own standards, because I'm unsure if you believe it currently is. CC7567 (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
      • I realized this a while ago, however I got suprisingly busy and unable to begin work on it until now. Reading through again, I realize it will require a lot of work. I'm currently going through and doing quite a bit of rewording, but I'm not quite rewriting it. I'll update you on my progress via IRC, but if you or any other Inq's feel it's taking too long, please let me know and I'd be willing to request a de-nomination so it wouldn't clog up the FAN page. Darth Trayus Sith Emblem (Trayus Academy) 19:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
        • For now, as long as it's moving, it's fine. However, I'm going to refrain from reviewing the article again until you're finished with it, since I don't want to object to things instead of giving you the opportunity to catch and fix them first. CC7567 (talk) 19:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

  • Requires an update from The Clone Wars: Hunting the Hunters (Part II). CC7567 (talk) 03:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • I'm unsure about taking over this one; I'd already promised to help the nominator with several sources that he did not have access to, but not take it over completely, persay. I'll make a decision in a few days, but I'd like to request that this nomination remain up for the time being. CC7567 (talk) 23:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
    • Trayus is welcome to take over this nomination. CC7567 (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (Inq only)

  1. Inqvote Nominator has recently been blocked for a significantly extended period of time and has informed an administrator that he has quit the site. If CC wants to take over this article for the sake of his project, I would be satisfied, but if not, I vote to remove. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:17, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Eh. Right now, I do not feel capable of tracking down all the sources. My sincere apologies to the nominator, whom I was going to help, but I don't want the nomination process to have to wait for me to find every appearance and clarify them. CC7567 (talk) 23:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
    • I recently informed CC via the IRC that I would be willing to take over this nomination and address any objections as best I can. While I lack two of the sources, I am able to find the information from them and do my best to keep this article in featured condition if it does get approved. Darth Trayus Sith Emblem (Trayus Academy) 01:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
      • Trayus, if you want to take it over, that's fine with me, and I'm sure the rest of the Inq will agree. Good luck, I'll try to give you a review soon. :) Chack Jadson (Talk) 14:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
      • Reinstating my vote per the nomination's current handler, as he believes that he cannot give enough attention to properly improve the article for the time being. CC7567 (talk) 06:02, September 8, 2009 (UTC)