- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Kassius Konstantine's Interdictor
- Nominated by: Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I usually dislike "unnamed" ships but it felt rude to do Constrainer and not this one
- Date Archived: 18:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Final word count: 1658 words (237 introduction, 1214 body, 207 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 1471 words (198 introduction, 1067 body, 206 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:REB
(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- Wok142 (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
—spookywillowwtalk 03:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)- Lewisr (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fan26 (Talk) 16:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Beautiful job not including all those other "names" as alternates in the intro. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 05:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)- CometSmudge (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Object
Wok142
In the second paragraph of Blockading Atollon, the sentence "Rebel Commander Jun Sato predicted that there would be no escape for the rebel fleet, upon realizing that the Empire was using Interdictor vessels." could be smoother. I propose reorganizing it this way (I also replaced "predicted" with "lamented" as I think that works better tonally): "Realizing that the Empire was using Interdictor vessels, rebel Commander Jun Sato lamented that there would be no escape for the rebel fleet."Wok142 (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)- Yes I like that, added.
In the second sentence of the second paragraph of Defying Thrawn section, I would add "onboard" at the end of that sentence to say "leaving only himself and two rebel pilots onboard."Wok142 (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)One more thing. Can Sienar Fleet Systems be added as the manufacturer? The Interdictor-class Star Destroyer page includes that and so does another Interdictor, the Spectral.Wok142 (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)- We have a precedent of not carrying manufacturer over to individual ships, since I believe we've seen multiple examples of this not being accurate (eg Sienar building ISDs, not Kuat). I haven't done this for any of my other individual ship status articles so I'm hesitant to do so here unless it's a decision from wider discussion. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 21:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- I get kinda confused thinking about when to use Template:Imo with ships with titles like this. I've created this file to show what each source refers to this ship as, just to confirm the current template usage is correct. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Just a small note that the page needs an update from Star Wars: The Rise and Fall of the Galactic Empire Lewisr (talk) 20:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 18:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)