Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Jedi Temple

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Jedi Temple

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

1. I think the article as at its best, there isnt a lot of new info that will be flowing in any time soon, and it is all around a good article! P.L. 05:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Object

1. Well, unfortunately, it isn't about liking the article. Please read the rules at the top of this page. —Graestan^{(This party's over)} 05:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
2. From the Grey of Man:
   • It's not sourced, at all, and needs to be fully sourced per rule 3 and 11.
   • From taking a look at the article, I can almost guarantee that not all relevant appearances and information from sources are covered.
   • Intro needs to be quite longer for an FA, per rule 7.
   • There...are...bullets...in the main article of the body.
   • This image needs to be sourced properly per rule 12.
   • Appearances list is not complete. (Example: it says "Jedi Apprentice series")
     • This is all just from a cursory glance...

   Greyman^(Paratus) 05:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

3. Needs sourcing. Please Inqs, remove this. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 23:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Remove nom (Inq only)

1. This article is not even worthy of my desk. It's horrible and all of Purpilia's comments above happen to be completely wrong. New information will be coming out from the EGTTF, this article is not at its best, and it is certainly not good. Remove with extreme prejudice. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 14:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
2. Greyman^(Paratus) 16:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
3. Please. Hey, why are we using the Inqvote template for this bit? Thefourdotelipsis 01:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
4. Because it makes us scarier.—Graestan^{(This party's over)} 01:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
5. Imperialles 16:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
6. Lord Hydronium 01:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)