Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Human/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Human

Support

  1. Darthchristian (Hey!) 7:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Doesn't cite sources. --ATATatarismall.png 15:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
  • As per Imp. .... 21:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Ditto (Rule 11) —Xwing328(Talk) 15:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
  • This is basically a citation problem, but I am disturbed by the "racial and ethnic characteristics" section. It needs to go unless it can be written in a properly cited in-universe style. - breathesgelatinTalk 05:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • And some MOS ignorising. .... 23:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Humans suck. Jwebb13HoloNetSith Emblem 00:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Objection overridden by Inquisitorius - Wookieepedia:Inq/Human 13:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • Question: Should Bts include a note about how we decided to change the capitalization of Human for consistency, etc? —Xwing328(Talk) 15:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Perhaps so. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
      • I made a note of it. Chack Jadson 01:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Someone has sourced it, somewhat. However, it probably could use a bit more detail; I didn't have time to read the entire article. Hobbes15(Tiger Headquarters) 02:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)