Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Grievous/Legends (second nomination)

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Grievous

  1. --TIEPilot051999 07:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. --Rune Haako 12:03, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. --User:Grievous7318 03:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. --DarkShroud 9:31, 16 2006 (UTC)
  6. SFH 02:38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  7. BambookidX 03:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  8. RMF 03:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Objections

  • We need to settle the question of the title first. —Silly Dan (talk) 12:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed with Dan; articles with ongoing disputes are a no-no for FA's. --MarcK [talk] 12:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
    • As soon as the title discussion is over, though, I'll put my vote in support. —Silly Dan (talk) 20:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
      • OK, now that the title dispute is solved, now can it be nominated?TIEPilot051999 00:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
        • Yes. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Comments

  • I remember a time, not too long ago, where this article was pegged to be a featured one. Unfortunately, around that time, I was left without internet access. Well, it seems that since I've been back, someone went to work on it. That, combined with the fact that both Unknown Soldier: The Story of General Grievous and The Story of General Grievous II: Lord of War gave even more info on him, makes me believe that now is the time to make it a featured one.TIEPilot051999 07:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
  • This is actually a pretty good article. -- SFH 02:38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with SFH. I would love to see this article as a featured article.-- DarkShroud 10:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)