Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Fall of Korriban

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Fall of Korriban
    • 1.1 (5 Inqs/1 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Attack of the Clone
        • 1.1.2.2 Jeffers
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Fall of Korriban

  • Nominated by: Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 22:53, June 29, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I will eventually do all of the GGW battles. Maybe.

(5 Inqs/1 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. I should get to the Sith Master article soon. :P JangFett (Talk) 14:56, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:57, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote CC7567 (talk) 07:32, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote GOod work. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 04:50, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:23, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Menkooroo 12:26, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Attack of the Clone
  • "The corporal agreed": who's this corporal? It seems like context is missing on him earlier, if any.
    • Inserted a mention in the prelude. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 07:21, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • That's it from me. Good work otherwise—just watch linking. CC7567 (talk) 21:03, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 07:21, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
Jeffers
  • There looks to be some inconsistency in the style of reffing: Ref [3], as the source of Vindican and Kao Cen Darach's names, simply refs the wallpaper with no explanatory note, while Ref [8], as the source of Jace Malcolm's name, refs the interview and additionally includes an explanatory note. Can you consistitize it? I think that no explanatory note is better, as the explanation is already in the prose --- stating that somebody is named Jace Malcolm doesn't require a redundant "So and so source states that his name is Jace Malcolm" in the ref.
    • Someone else added ref 8, which would explain the inconsistency. I've fixed 'er up.
  • This admittedly seems minor, but: Does the Tingel Arm Campaign begin when the Sith first enter the Tingel Arm, or does it begin when the Republic later enters? The intro links to it upon the first mention of the Sith's activity in the Tingel Arm, but the bio doesn't link it until a mention of the Republic's activity. Again, super minor, but it does seem like a slight disagreement between the bio and intro in terms of "link to something on its first mention." I'd sofix this, but I know that you'll know better than me which definition is correct. :)
    • When the Republic later enters. I've altered the intro linking to better reflect that. Thanks for bringing that up though; I can see how unclear it was before.
  • Can Imperial Armada and Republic Navy make their way into either the "Combatants" or "Strength" fields of the infobox?
    • I got the Armada in there, but the Republic Navy was very specifically not present, because they were too busy in the Tingel Arm. I noted the participation of the Imperial Army as well; is that okay with you? I sort of formatted it like the Sacking of Coruscant, but left out the Republic Military because the troopers were their only combatants. Whaddyathink?
      • Perfect. I've added Imperial Army (and Sith Warrior) to the bio so that there's no infobox-exclusive info.
  • "The return of the Sith" --- Dialogue, not quote, for more than two speakers, baby!
    • Woopsie. Got it.
  • All from me. Fantastic stuff. Menkooroo 06:29, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 08:32, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 12:26, October 16, 2011 (UTC)