Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Darth Sion

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Darth Sion

  • Nominated by: Lord Hydronium 15:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: ZOMBIES

(5 Inqs/5 Users/10 Total)

Support

  1. Inqvote It seems like some of the KOTOR II info might need a bit more ambiguity, but still really good. Cull Tremayne 22:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. Jedi Kasra (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Excellent. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. Excellent improvements in a very short time. Drewton Era-old (Drewton's Holocron) 17:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Excellent stuff - makes me wish Kotor II's cut content was removed ... - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 09:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
  6. Jinzler 21:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
  7. The article itself is excellent. My only concern would be, IF, Sion does turn out to be Lucien Draay, then a whole lot of re-writting is going to need to be done. Jayce Carver 10:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
  8. A great and complete article...odd from a kotor2 character, all the plot holes. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 04:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
  9. Inqvote Thefourdotelipsis 02:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  10. Inqvote -- Darth Culator (Talk) 02:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Object

  1. Nice work. However, I am not quite satisfied with some of the images. It seems some of the in-game screenshots have been shot at less-than-optimal graphics settings. This is true of the images File:Sion Triumvirate.jpg, File:Sion Korriban.jpg, and File:Sion Atton.jpg. Try going back and re-shooting them with higher settings, or get someone like, say, Redemption to help you out. Additionally, is File:HarbingerBridge.png shot with the high-res movie patch installed? If not, it should ideally be re-done. Cheers. --Imperialles 10:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. I have seen a lot of fan discussion over whether Haazen could be Sion. I'm fairly sure this has been established to be incorrect, but I wonder if it would be appropriate to add to the BTS. It could certainly be sourced. On other occasions we have included some notes about fan reception. --Eyrezer 18:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
    • After some discussion in IRC, I'm rather uncertain about this. I'm fine with fan theories for things that haven't been settled or turned out to be correct, but I'm not so sure about ones that have been shown to be wrong. - Lord Hydronium 18:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
      • Sounds fair enough. --Eyrezer 04:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. There is some speculation that Lucien Draay is in fact Sion, as can be seen here. While this is probably wrong, as it contradicts the Great Sith War stuff, the name "Darth Sion" is mentioned in Knights of the Old Republic 34: Vindication, Part 3 by Haazen as a possible Sith name that Draay will take in the future. I think that this contention is perhaps worthy of some mention in the article --Jinzler 16:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
    • It's mentioned in the in-universe parts of the article. OOU, since it's contradicted, I'd prefer to go with the reasoning used for Haazen and leave it out. - Lord Hydronium 00:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 04:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't think we need to worry about Draay being Sion, since it indicates in the Knights of the Old Republic Campaign Guide that he isn't.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)