Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Darth Cognus

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Darth Cognus
    • 1.1 (4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Fiolli
        • 1.1.2.2 Eyrezer
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Darth Cognus

  • Nominated by: —Tommy 9281 21:12, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
"Tommy9281, because of you, the Sith will never die. You have earned the right to bear the mark of…Dark Lord of the Sith."
―— — 20?cb=20250116042720 Link▶️ (file info)[src]

(4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. Nice work! It seems you like doing articles realted to the Darth Bane trilogy.--ID-21 Dolphin 21:22, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 21:41, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Why can't Chris Nolan direct the film adaptations of the Darth Bane Trilogy?--Lord David 04:12, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Nicely done. Chack Jadson (Talk) 20:29, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 13:06, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Wow. Awesome work, Tommy.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 17:47, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Inqvote --Eyrezer 12:43, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Fiolli

Just one thing: "…like most members of her species…" First, please reword this so that it does not sound like speculation. Right now it sounds like we're supposing this rather than having canon to prove it. Next, does this actually come from DOE? It is cited there (as well as in the P&A), but that seems odd. Just double checking on this one. Thanks. Great work. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:42, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

  • It is in DoE, but the source actually says "all" Iktotchi, so I changed it to that, cool? Otherwise, thanks for the review, master Fiolli. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy 9281 02:19, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
    • I like. Nice work, Tommy. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 13:06, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
Eyrezer
  • In the first para of Second contract, it says the Huntress' skills were called on a second time, then explains the Princess' trip to Coruscant, ending with her wanting the Huntress for a second time. This seems a bit convoluted. Better to reword it to remove the first time you say she was used again, and just have the detail of the Princess' trip leading to that. --Eyrezer 08:42, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
    • Done. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:13, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
    • Hey Tommy, sorry for addressing this. For some reason I was looking at this and thinking it was our co-project, and I just looked again and realized this is not. Completely my mistake, and I apologize. Feel free to revert and do whatever you want here. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:16, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
      • No worries at all, Grand Master.—Tommy 9281 14:31, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 12:43, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

  • Thanks to Jonjedigrandmaster, Chack Jadson, and Master Jonathan.—Tommy 9281 21:12, August 30, 2010 (UTC)