Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Coruscant Eastern Spaceport

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Coruscant Eastern Spaceport

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Updates are fun. Retcon updates merging two major subjects? Less so
  • Date Archived: 02:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 1470 words (218 introduction, 948 body, 304 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 1468 words (214 introduction, 950 body, 304 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Objection handled via Discord.—spookywillowwtalk 20:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Wok142 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote I hope we can get a Westport FAN, too. :P Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 06:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
  5. Booply (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
  6. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 01:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Object

Wok
  • Here is my copyedit, tried to make some things be a bit smoother in a few spots
    • Looks good to me, thanks! Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Separatist Crisis could use a date in the intro.
  • In Terminals and transit cars, I think the location of the desk in the sentence "Directly in front of the car's sliding doors was a circular desk" should be described relative to a permanent structure as opposed to a car. You could say something like "Directly in front of the arrival area" or something like that. Same thing for this part: "above the car doors was a sign in Aurebesh" - does that make sense?
  • More of a question but in Imperial Era and beyond, should "eastern spaceport" be capitalized or are you just referring to it descriptive-wise and not as a proper noun? Just want to be sure about this. Wok142 (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Was going with the description just for some variety, but can be changed if you'd prefer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
      • Leaving it as is will be fine. Just wanted to be 100% sure that it worked as intended. Wok142 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 01:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)