Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Clone Wars/Legends (second nomination)

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Clone Wars

  1. Wstonefi 19:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. LandoSystem1138 22:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  3. AdamwankenobiTalk to me! My home. 22:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  4. Novajoe23 17:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  5. --Eyrezer 12:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Commander Jake
  7. TIEPilot051999 17:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  8. EAGLES610 01:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  9. Rhysode 10:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  10. Polifemo (talk to me) 04:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  11. Lord Vader 15:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
  12. Snoop 14:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  13. Great article and really detailed. MaulYoda
  14. KEJ 09:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Objections

  • *Definitely detailed too major a topic. --MaulYoda 00:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm confused...what's too major of a topic?EAGLES610 00:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • It means that it's too important a topic, like too well known or, you know. --MaulYoda 02:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree about the picture intro. What was the rationale for having that in the first place? - Breathesgelatin 09:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Previous objection withdrawn now that the picture intro has been removed. I do have one more concern. Namely, since clearly this article was the work of many wookieepedians, there seems to be a lack of consistency in the article. For example, the Year One campaigns are explained briefly and each section has a picture. In Year Two, some of the campaign's explanations are too wordy (people should just click on the battle or mission pages to get the extremely detailed info) and lack images. I think that this should be cleaned up for consistency although I think the article is in every other way worthy of being an FA. - Breathesgelatin 22:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • The beginning is really quite sloppy. MaulYoda
  • Quite a short intro. Also pretty lousy BTS for such a major subject. And, as always, it sure would be nice to know where [[:File:Troopers2-6.jpg]], File:Ruins of Kessia.jpg, File:Pengalan.jpg and File:84PalpatineSpeechFinal.jpg came from. --UVnet 06:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments

  • It talks about every important battle and campaign in the war. It's also absolutely freaking huge. Definitely featured-worthy, IMO.Wstonefi 19:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Big article with cool picture thing at the beginning. Might need battle infobox. --MaulYoda 23:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I accidentally deleted the objections when trying to add my comment. Could someone revert it back please? Sorry!--LandoSystem1138 03:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Very comprehensive and well-written. The fact that it is a major topic is irrelevant. If something is featured quality, its featured quality. Besides, we've had major topics be featured before, like Anakin Skywalker and Yoda.
    • Never mind the topic thing. --MaulYoda 16:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • still needs work, i agree with the comment saying that some bits are to wordy, for example Mace Windu on Harun Kul, the section is huge, has no picture (such as Kar Vastor) and i think is more detailed than the actual article..il have to go chec k on that though. Jedi Dude
  • Waaaaaay too long. Period. For an article about a war, it goes into far too much detail about the actions of individuals, especially when those actions don't really affect the course of the conflict. There should be short summaries about the battles, not longer versions of the article of each one. --Thetoastman 01:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)