Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Chiss/Legends (second nomination)

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Chiss

  1. StarNeptune 04:17, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  2. SFH 04:45, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  3. CooperTFN 05:34, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  4. --MarcK [talk] 13:58, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  5. Kir Kanos (Hail the Empire!) 22:50, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  6. Tam 16:01, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  7. SparqMan 16:43, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • I think this is very well written. My only complaint is the shortness of the intro, but I'm sure it can be lengthened to fit the FA requirements. StarNeptune 04:17, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree. And Star, you forgot to actually vote for the article. -- SFH 04:45, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • I did originally vote, but removed my vote because of confusion over the objection system. Not used to it yet lol. I'll put it back in. —Unsigned comment by StarNeptune (talk • contribs)
      • To think, it wasn't too long ago that I nominated this thing for the I-Drive... CooperTFN 05:34, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • I've gotten rid of all duplicate links, might run down the italics and such a bit later. --MarcK [talk] 15:21, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • I've now ironed out the quotation, italics and bold problems that SparqMan mentioned, and will throw my name into the list of supporters. As for the lead, we could just use the first sentence with the first paragraph of the Overview, like so. --MarcK [talk] 13:58, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Extremely well written. One of the nicest articles I've ever seen. I should definatly put it in my top five articles section of my main page. Kir Kanos (Hail the Empire!) 22:50, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC) P.S. I'm pretty sure that no one has noticed, but I haven't been active for a while due to applications. I'll get to do a lot of work this weekend with out a doubt.
  • I've edited it some more per SparqMan's objections: expanded the lead, got rid of the overly poetic wording, and moved the list of Chiss. --MarcK [talk] 23:49, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Seems fine to me now. I think the main sections might need subsections to break up the large text. --SparqMan 16:43, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)