Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Ames Uravan

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ames Uravan

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 03:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Scientists! More! All of them. Also, this was my second GAN ever (and failed) from 2018 so it's nice to see how far its come.
  • Date Archived: 05:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 1110 words (195 introduction, 766 body, 149 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 1089 words (192 introduction, 771 body, 126 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB

(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Inqvote ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 12:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 05:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Nice throwback, I remember reviewing this for both GANs! Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 10:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
  4. CometSmudge (talk) 02:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  5. Wok142 (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 05:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Object

Comet
  • Per what you said on discord, shouldn't the trailer be a 1stm instead of 1st pictured?
  • Do you think Rise and Fall should count as an IMO?
  • The article says he was a pioneer and does mention he used phase-shifted grafting techniques, but it doesn't explicitly say he pioneered those techniques, which I think would be worth including. Also, I kind of think phase-shifted grafting could have its own page. CometSmudge (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Wok
  • Death Star have more context in the intro
  • Should that last para in Executed on Eadu be split into a Legacy section?
    • Admittedly, this is somewhat intentional. It's such a small amount of information that both Ayre and I's ones for these scientists don't separate it; if this was causing it to be a bloated-sized third paragraph, then perhaps, but imo better to keep consistent with the other passed ones.—spookywillowwtalk 04:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
      • Yea I mean if it's not in blatant violation of anything then I think combining it makes logical sense. Wok142 (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Would it be best to not mention his death ahead of time and just say he was a doctor "by 1 BBY" or something to that effect as opposed to "by the time of his death" ? Wok142 (talk) 03:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 05:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)