Wookieepedia:EduCorps/EduCorps nominations archive/Olioster

< Wookieepedia:EduCorps | EduCorps nominations archive
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a EduCorps nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Olioster (7 EC + 7 users/0/0)

Two-week deadline from first request, voting ends on February 22, 2011.

Support
  1. Olioster has been doing a solid work on nominating and reviewing a large bunch of Comprehensive article nominations, without being shy on maintaining the nomination page with all the archiving work. Also I find benefitical his expertise on those small and obscure articles of SWG. As far as I can see, he's basicly been doing the EC-work without having the badge. Considering all the work he has done, and that it wouldn't hurt having more of EC:s, I find Olioster an excellent candidate. –Tm_T (Talk) 11:49, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  2. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 16:26, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Absolutely. Menkooroo 16:42, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Per Tm_T. Master Jonathan (Council Chambers) Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 17:59 UTC
  5. ECvote Definitely a worthy addition. ~ SavageBob 21:47, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  6. NAYAYEN—it appears to be a frammistat 22:16, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  7. ECvote Grunny (talk) 01:00, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  8. ECvote Most definitely.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 05:25, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  9. ECvote Olioster is a good guy. And besides, the CAN is lagging badly already. =P 1358 (Talk) 20:37, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  10. We really need a more active EC on the CAN page. Olioster both nominates and reviews articles frequently, and I think that with him as an EC there might be more EC activity on the CAN page. My last nom had 8 votes when it passed. Only 1 was an EC. This is not unusual. Most current EC's only have that position because they're in the AgriCorps or Inquistorius, not because they genuinely work on Comprehensive articles, which creates an illusion as to how many of them there actually are. Holocron Greatholocron (Complain) 07:55, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
  11. ECvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 16:49, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
  12. Graestan(Talk) 16:50, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
  13. ECvote CC7567 (talk) 20:07, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
  14. ECvote—Tommy 9281 Sunday, February 13, 2011, 12:07 UTC
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
  • Nomination accepted on IRC. –Tm_T (Talk) 11:49, February 8, 2011 (UTC)