Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified wealthy woman's husband

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified wealthy woman's husband
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 Comet
        • 1.1.2.2 Lew
        • 1.1.2.3 spookly
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified wealthy woman's husband

  • Nominated by: Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 02:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 23:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 103 words (0 introduction, 72 body, 31 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 104 words (0 introduction, 67 body, 37 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:LEGO WP:AMB

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ECvote CometSmudge (talk) 04:25, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 20:07, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  3. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 23:29, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comet
  • Is the voice actor supposed to be mentioned in the BTS? Doesn't sound like they have any dialogue CometSmudge (talk) 02:29, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Complete accident, was left over from a copy. Removed! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 03:50, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • The human category appears to be in need of changing, though might also be worth noting in the body the woman was a human Lewisr (talk) 17:01, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Ah right, removed and noted Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 19:24, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • "Important" should be re-contextualized not as an outright fact as this claims in the first sentence, but instead noting in prose that the wife held the opinion that the husband (this article) was important. "Important" (and other words such as "legendary" "amazing" etc.) are very hard to make as outright fact claims unless a reference book is saying it; otherwise its always contextualized to say whose opinion that was IU to avoid WP:NPOV.—spookywillowwtalk 17:06, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Ah you're absolutely right, how's that? Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 18:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 23:29, 16 September 2025 (UTC)