Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified green-and-tan-faced species

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified green-and-tan-faced species
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 Comet
        • 1.1.2.2 spookly
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified green-and-tan-faced species

  • Nominated by: Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 17:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 00:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 236 words (0 introduction, 136 body, 100 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 221 words (0 introduction, 127 body, 94 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Aliens WP:Visions

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ECvote CometSmudge (talk) 21:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 00:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 00:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comet
  • A date range could be added CometSmudge (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Added! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 22:40, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
      • I still don't think the 18 BBY date can be used, since an overlap between Tk and stormtrooper armor is possible. There's even a case of clone armor being used in 15 BBY. CometSmudge (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • Maghadi is introduced without context.
  • In the same vein as this copy edit of Lew's, such a short BTS doesn't have enough content to properly have a subsection header like that. Usually on 1-3 paragraph BTS for SAs, the concept art gallery section simply sits below the prose and doesn't count as a proper "section" in that it doesn't require content above it to also have sectioning, unless there's obviously 2+ subsections then its moot anyway.—spookywillowwtalk 02:27, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Ah okay thank you! I was unsure, fixed both objections! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 02:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 00:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)