Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified flat-headed frog-like species

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified flat-headed frog-like species

  • Nominated by: Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 17:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 02:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 182 words (0 introduction, 101 body, 81 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 169 words (0 introduction, 102 body, 67 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Alien WP:Visions

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 18:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. ECvote CometSmudge (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. Stake black msg 04:00, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
  4. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 12:49, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
  5. Skifffy (talk) 02:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • I believe you may have misunderstood Spooky's objection before on here, while the top subsection header of the BTS wasn't needed due to the reasons she mentioned, the concept art gallery one was needed. Note that it's also missing on Daal Lewisr (talk) 17:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Ah thank you yeah I did misunderstand, fixed. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 00:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • So, it is standard to include release dates on media mentioned in BTS. As also on noms from other episodic media, episodes are almost always in " and not in, italics—which Visions' SA portfolio also seems to follow. I really would advise re-reading for the permanently mandatory stuff like including release dates. I'm aware we spoke about this before, but I did actually bring this up with several other Inqs for a second opinion, who concur, and since its been recurring recently, I'm passing this along collectively regardless. And yes; I'm also aware several of the cases recently (ie visions channel) were due to something distracting irl resulting in various things being missed, but regardless, nothing wrong with waiting till it's a better time to proofread to then put up (its actually preferred). I apologize if that comes across in a way that's not preferable, but I'd be ahppy to link to the onsite example cases if needed. In any case, minimal objection noms pass faster anyway. Regardless:
    • Fixed. Didn't come across in any bad way, and yes you're right I'll wait until later when there's distractions IRL. Apologies for the mistakes again, and thank you for always thoroughly reviewing. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 22:27, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Per Guaqa/Other Visions noms, and all non-canon content nominations, a media's non-canon status is always noted in the BTS if it is known or available.
  • It seems like most other Visions noms, such as Unidentified black slayer droid/Unidentified Keredian for example, very consistently call the Visions installments "short film" instead of "episode," which also seems to reflect in page titles like The Pit (short film) being named like that instead of episode. Unless there's been perhaps a change announced or if they've recently switched to how they refer to those.
  • Visions as a series also seems to be missing some context. At minimum, calling it a series would be ideal, but it seems like most noms from this WP use "anthology series."
  • If the information about "bulging eyes" "large black pupils" and the other bits mentioned in prose are accurate, then these qualify as distinctions for the infobox field.—spookywillowwtalk 22:14, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Fixed the above, I didn't realize I left the BTS majority unchanged before nominating it. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 22:27, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 02:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)