Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified dancer

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified dancer

  • Nominated by: NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 22:08, September 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: She was putting herself through law school.

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Sure she was... Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 02:36, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Now we will have a CA on a person only identified by a boot.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:45, September 22, 2011 (UTC)
    • Well, we've had an article on something identified by a boot before. :p NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:29, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ECvote ~SavageBOB sig 15:42, October 10, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ECvote --Eyrezer 07:48, October 11, 2011 (UTC)

Object

  1. Rise, Unidentified Dancer
    • First of all, you need to make a category for dancers. Right now, it's just a redlink in the categories.
      • Changed to Entertainers. Also: Wikia. That is all. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 00:32, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
        • Make that Performing artists. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 00:36, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • You should probably add the Category:Individuals of unspecified gender. It looks like it's female, but, even though it sounds sick, it could be a guy.
      • Added. And people come in all kinds. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 00:32, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • I've heard from other users, such as Menkooroo, that you should start out your articles with "A dancer" instead of "This dancer". I fixed it this time, just thought I'd put the bug in your ear.
      • I'm not going to change it back because it doesn't make a difference to me, but has that been made into a policy yet? The rationale for people starting to do that was that people felt "A" lent iself to a more IU perspective, but I personally think "This" works better and that "A" actually takes away from that perspective. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 00:32, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
        • I personally, as several people have agreed, think that it sounds more professional. That's the general way that it's accepted, but I don't believe that it's "official policy" yet. Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 02:31, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • I've also heard users say that you should place the CAnom template below the solid templates. For example, put the eras template, then the Conjecture template, and then the CAnom.
      • I don't think that neccesarily matters. It's going to be taken off in the end. And if we were to standardize its placement then it should go at the top, so the permanent parts of the article are contiguous. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 00:32, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
        • Like I said, I'm just passing on what I heard. I do it like I said above, but I'm not going to be nit-picky about it. Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 02:31, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • Otherwise, looks good. (Even if you took the nom before I could get to it.) :P Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 00:08, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I think you should add a mention of the three individuals enjoying her work. Luckily for you, their articles are already written. --Eyrezer 00:58, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • Added. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 02:12, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Can you source 27 BBY to the comic?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:33, September 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • According to the Jango Fett articles that all just passed, yes. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 01:20, September 21, 2011 (UTC)
  4. The cantina is called the "Twirling Twi'lek" and all the other visible dancers are Twi'leks. While you have categorised this individual as being of an unidentified species, I think you should highlight these factors re species in the BTS. --Eyrezer 10:54, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
    • Done. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:21, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments