Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Vrot (Cuipernam)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Vrot (Cuipernam)

• Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:10, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: About time I finished this :P For all the novels

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

1. As long as the second sentence is reworded like Ayrehead mentioned... - Princess GLG 22:07, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:43, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
3. Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 23:07, July 13, 2013 (UTC)
4. 501st dogma^(talk) 12:58, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object

1. Exiled Jedi
   • The Vrots category is a redlink.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 15:35, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
     • Oops, I thought I made that page a week ago :P
   • The era field of the infobox is a redlink.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 15:55, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
     • Oops, I meant that it lacked a source.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 00:56, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
       • Oops, done
2. Princess
   • The era needs to be added to the infobox. - Princess GLG 22:48, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
     • Fixed. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:47, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
       • Source? - Princess GLG 23:44, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
         • Done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:41, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
   • If you know that the weapon he had had a trigger, do you know anything else about what kind of weapon it was? (Mainly, was it a blaster?) - Princess GLG 12:10, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
     • All I know is it had a trigger.
       • Ok, just making sure. - Princess GLG 22:07, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
3. 501st
   • You should bold the Vrot in the beginning of the body.... 501st dogma^(talk) 12:38, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
     • Done
   • The first sentence seems a bit of a run on, because it has so many ands and such. Could you see if you could change it? 501st dogma^(talk) 23:55, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
     • Do you mean the second sentence? Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:34, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
       • Bah. Fix that... 501st dogma^(talk) 20:02, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
         • Broke up the sentence, do you want me to try breaking up the now slightly longer third sentence too? :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:06, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
           • Yep. 501st dogma^(talk) 14:44, July 4, 2013 (UTC)
             • Done and done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:05, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
4. Ayrehead
   • Couldn't you include breifly why the mercenaries were attacking the group? Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:06, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
     • How's this? Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:04, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
       • The informations good but I think you need to change "during" to "he took part in" in the second sentence. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:01, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
         • Done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:34, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments