Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Sith Knight

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Sith Knight

  • Nominated by: Jinzler 13:50, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Basically, I want to check out this new process

(3 GCs/5 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. Thefourdotelipsis 13:51, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperialles 14:38, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Boring sigs above this vote. :P -- 1358 (Talk) 16:18, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ~ SavageBob 17:26, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ECvote Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 22:02, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  6. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 10:30, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  7. --TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 11:11, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  8. ECvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 17:59, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Can we get a date of publication for his one and only appearance in BTS? Perhaps some context for how and why he is mentioned in the OS? ~ SavageBob 16:25, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
    • Added --Jinzler 16:34, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Hey Jinzler can I get your opinion on this? Frankly, I think bolding a conjectural title is useless and looks bad. Highlighting the work "person" doesn't really help a reader in any way. Maybe conjectural titles simply shouldn't be bolded at all. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 10:30, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
    • I agree with you fully. I only put in bold here because of the precedents set by other articles, but it does seem to be a bit unneccessary and doesn't really achieve much. --Jinzler 17:55, June 6, 2010 (UTC)