- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Unidentified Ho'Din patron
- Nominated by: Eyrezer 02:03, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
- Cal Jedi
(Personal Comm Channel) 17:25, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 19:23, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
~Savage
12:38, September 6, 2011 (UTC)- NaruHina Talk
19:42, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Object
It seems to me that you could create an article for the dancer.--Exiled Jedi(Greetings) 03:05, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Eyrezer 09:44, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Do you know how funny it would be if someone took that article to the CAN page?--Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 19:23, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Do you know how funny it would be if someone took that article to the CAN page?--Exiled Jedi
- Done. --Eyrezer 09:44, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
Last I checked, we aren't supposed to use the person's species as the bolded identifier in the intro. The reasoning being that it's not their species that makes them notable enough for an article, but whatever they were doing or otherwise (in cases where there's no other choice) that they were an individual or a synonym.NaruHina Talk
18:51, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to cut in, but there's no policy, or even consensus on this one, as far as I know. For unidentified individuals, I've seen some users bold "individual," some bold the species, some bold the sex, etc, etc. I've bolded Human female or something similar in a lot of GAs before and had no problem with it --- it seems to just be a matter of taste. Menkooroo 16:01, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments