Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Alcedian Jedi

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Alcedian Jedi

  • Nominated by: DarthSkyll (talk) 10:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 09:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 192 words (0 introduction, 154 body, 38 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 04:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 04:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
  3. —SnowedLightning (they/them) 21:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Panther436 (talk) 05:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Object

spookly
  • Under 165 words in body, requires desection.
  • "Unidentified Alcedian Jedi" is available as a more concise page title.
  • From GAN: The article needs to explicitly state that this character was part of the Jedi Order. It's done sometimes in a way that would, in this case, result in "An Alcedian Jedi of the Jedi Order…".
  • Also from GAN: "during or before the High Republic Era" is unnecessary. The mural couldn't have been constructed before the building existed, and the article already states that the temple was constructed decades before a defined date. Makes for a wordy sentence and falls under the logic of things we normally don't include due to the duck test of "it existed by the time of its first appearance," as a general given.
  • Image caption missing punctuation.—spookywillowwtalk 18:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
    • Scratch that last one; image will likely be removed due to desection thus making it not relevant.—spookywillowwtalk 19:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
      • I moved the page and I moved this page (I hope that was correct) and I addressed the other objections, too. DarthSkyll (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Lew
  • I think it would be better to context the location for Valo as either an Outer Rim planet or within the Occlusion Zone, to note the former is what other noms from the book have been doing. Either way, this would allow you to remove the Rising Storm reference as Escape from Valo states both Lewisr (talk) 07:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 05:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)