Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Trever Flume's mother

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Trever Flume's mother

  • Nominated by: NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 09:41, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Could it be...a...BIOGRAPHY?!

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 09:11, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
  2. OLIOSTER (talk) 19:24, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Darth Morrt 01:26, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 03:35, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object

  1. O_o A Blasphemous Biography!
  2. Morrt
    • Are you sure that "early in the war" can be interpreted as 22-21 BBY? Why not just 22 or 22-20?
      • The war was only lasted until 19 BBY. Circa one year is close enough to "early." Watch her be in TCW. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 12:48, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
    • You can go further in the categories to Category:Republic Navy officers, because she is surely not an army captain, but a navy captain. Darth Morrt 10:42, December 12, 2010 (UTC)
      • What's your logic there? NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 12:48, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
        • I've tried to say that the army captains are clones, so she must be a navy captain. But I've realized just now that not every army personnel are clones, like Ozzel in the TCW comic. But this leads to an other objection: her affiliation should be changed to Republic Military, because we don't know whether she serves the GAR or the Navy. Darth Morrt 17:28, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
          • Good catch. I'd always assumed the GAR was the catch-all armed forces. Didn't know they culled Ozzel into TCW either...shame. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 00:40, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Despite how articles on unidentified characters have traditionally been done, there's been a recent push to jettison uses of "This" in them. I think the logic is that it seems like an OOU description. How do you feel about changing both instances of "this" to "a" ? Menkooroo 03:35, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • I think that's a stupid thing to regulate. In my mind it doesn't break the fourth wall in any way. If you think what an IU character would write in this situation, there is no way they would put "a Rebel Pilot fought in the First Galactic Civil War" because it disconnects the article from the character in question. On that note, and for expediency, I will change it if you really want me too but I would not it would take revision I'd prefer not to do right now (busy, busy) as we cant have "A soldier, a Human female..." for obvious reasons. If we could possibly use these as some kind of cut off point for this regulation, should it become precedent, I would appreciate it astronomically. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 23:39, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
      • Well, OK. :P Menkooroo 02:28, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
  4. From the Council Chambers:
    • "the Confederacy of Independent Systems's secession from the Galactic Republic plunged the galaxy into the Clone Wars between the militant Separatists and the government." This last bit seems redundant to the first part of what I quoted. Can it be removed?
    • Otherwise, nice job. Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 19:06, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Menkooroo, are you no longer objecting? ~ SavageBob 17:54, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
    • Yeah; I didn't support because the article already had enough votes. My objection is struck, though, so I'm satisfied. :) Menkooroo 05:55, January 19, 2011 (UTC)