Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Spear Squadron

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Spear Squadron

• Nominated by: Gethralkin^Hyperwave 15:50, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Needed doing. Similar in content to Ebon Squadron.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

1. NaruHina ^Talk 16:08, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
2. --Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 20:40, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
3. ~Savage 15:18, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
4. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:42, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object

1. Salutations
   • Why are you linking to the gallery for a reference here? That doesn't say anything about indoctrination or the Navy as far as I can see. If that information is on the card, then the ref should be to the card. NaruHina ^Talk 20:22, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
     • The gallery defines the icons on the miniature. The Imperial Fleet is represented on the miniature with the icon of the Empire printed on the stand. The official gallery defines the miniature "Type" as a space unit and the "Faction" icon on the unit as representing the Empire. As to the indoctrination, it's established in canon that TIE pilots are the best that Imperial academies offer and are indoctrinated to be loyal to the Emperor. However, I can go ahead and remove it since the citation does not encompass that fact. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 16:12, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
       • I've added in the missed "trooper" icon reference. The icon defines group/swarming tactics. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 16:52, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
         • Corrected the Bts error. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 16:55, November 21, 2011 (UTC)
           • Hokay then. Just Template:Cite web that and you should be good to go. NaruHina ^Talk 03:29, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
             • Done. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 15:13, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
2. Toprawa:
   • My objection/question sort of mirrors Naru's above. I'm confused how this gallery external link is being used as a source for specific information within the article. Since this is proving unclear to at least the two of us reviewers, I think that a description in that reference note explaining what you're explaining here would be appropriate. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:10, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
     • How's that? Gethralkin^Hyperwave 23:16, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
       • Also, I just realized that the reference tag was stuck to the wrong piece of info. That may have contributed to the confusion. It is fixed now, and I've added the release info in the Bts where it goes. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 07:38, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
         • Looks good. Terribly sorry for the delay. Busy time of year. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:42, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• Okay, it's been a whole month since this article was nominated. Is there anything else that it needs? Gethralkin^Hyperwave 14:23, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
  • Tope just has to strike his objection. Then it will be ready to archive if no one else objects. A month isn't too long to wait, though. I've waited two or three months for a CAnom to pass before. :P --Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 14:39, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • Not quite what I meant, although I appreciate the encouragement. I merely meant to ask if I was missing anything. The other articles I've done needed plenty of changes made before they were ready. If this is all I need for this one, I feel pretty good about it. Gethralkin^Hyperwave 05:40, December 21, 2011 (UTC)