Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Sev'rance Tann

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Sev'rance Tann
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 Lew
        • 1.1.2.2 Wok
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Sev'rance Tann

  • Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Surprise canonization!
  • Date Archived: 21:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 259 words (0 introduction, 148 body, 111 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 248 words (0 introduction, 149 body, 99 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:CIS

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 04:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Wok142 (talk) 17:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Lewisr (talk) 04:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
  4. ECvote —spookywillowwtalk 21:12, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • A release date for the issue should be added Lewisr (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
    • Done! Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
  • For the sake of minimising references, the capital and Outer Rim cites can both be changed to Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know, Updated and Expanded Lewisr (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
    • Fixed! Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Missing the relevant gender/pronouns/species categories Lewisr (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
    • Added! Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Wok
  • This might just be my opinion so feel free to disagree but I think one of the two statements here can be removed: either "With the battle turning against the Confederacy" or "as the clones pushed back the Separatist lines." They seem a bit redundant and they kind of combine to clunk up that sentence. Wok142 (talk) 21:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
    • I understand and considered removing actually before nomming, but personally think it should remain since it gives detail to what happened in the battle specifically to force Dooku into retreat Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
      • Cool, leaving as is will be fine. Wok142 (talk) 17:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 21:12, 10 February 2025 (UTC)