Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Ruati

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Ruati
    • 1.1 (3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Code-8
        • 1.1.2.2 Exiled Jedi
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Ruati

  • Nominated by: Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:22, April 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I miss these days

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 09:16, April 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 20:28, April 28, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 20:50, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 15:39, May 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Code-8
  • Why the bold in the quote?
    • It is that way in the comic.
      • I don't think that means it has to be bolded here. It just looks a bit wrong to me.
        • Per predence, yes it has to.
  • Perhaps a mention of the Clone Wars after including the date.
    • As the death is not related to the war, I don't think a mention is necessary.
  • There's an unnecessary comma after mentioning Obi-Wan.
    • Done. Sofixit?
  • If gender and species are unknown Bts should reflect this.
    • Added.
  • If its unconfirmed that Ventress was the assassin perhaps add unidentified before the assassin mention. Article may be needed as well.
    • It is highly likely that the assassin is Ventress. An article or even the mentioning of "unidentified" is not really a good idea.
  • I'm confused how Kenobi deduces that Ventress was alive from the investigation, can you elaborate any further? Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 08:45, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
    • No, all we have is this line. Clone Commander Lee Talk 13:30, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
      • Then maybe we need a Bts note saying that its not fully stated who killed this person. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 22:12, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
        • Better? Clone Commander Lee Talk 22:40, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I think it would be better to keep the events presented in chronological order in the article. Therefore, mention that it was Ventress who killed him before you mention Obi-Wan's investigation.
    • It is not said that Ventress was responsible. Therefore the order is correct.
      • Ah, okay. Maybe you should have a sentence in the BTS describing the situation.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:46, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
        • Added a small mention. Clone Commander Lee Talk 22:50, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
  • From the Manual of Style: "However, the community has decided that quotes taken from comics should not mimic emphasized boldfaced wording. Instead, only italics are to be used for emphasis."
    • Interesting, better?
  • Could you provide more context on the Clone Wars and the Confederacy? Since Ventress was with the Confederacy, I believe that Ruati's death necessitates addition context.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:19, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
    • As we don't know if Ruati was involved into the Clone Wars at all, I would prefer not to mention all this stuff, as it would be IMHO unnecessary context. However, I can remove "Confederate" if you like, so that this question would be resolved. Clone Commander Lee Talk 22:25, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
      • Sure, just mentioning her as a Dark Jedi should be enough.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:46, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
        • Killed the Confederate mention. Clone Commander Lee Talk 22:50, April 30, 2014 (UTC)

Comments