- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Repulsor pod
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Technological componetnts from ships and weapons are probably the greatest source of IU redlinks
- Date Archived: 14:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- Final word count: 192 words (0 introduction, 60 body, 132 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 134 words (0 introduction, 60 body, 74 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Fantasy Flight Games
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support votes
Fan26 (Talk) 02:57, 15 September 2025 (UTC)- Lewisr (talk) 03:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- StarWarsFan327 (talk) 11:41, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- —spookywillowwtalk 14:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Objections
spookly
It seems like this edit is worth following up with DKS on regarding the first non-canon mention as that'd still be something to note in BTS if it does indeed predate GG9.—spookywillowwtalk 23:31, 16 September 2025 (UTC)- Managed to find the article myself and have filled in the various redlinks and BTS as needed. Thanks for the heads up! Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- I do believe its the standard now onward to be using {{UnlicensedStatus}} as a citation to specifically denote those unlicensed magazines as "non-canon" with respect to Legends, as there are still other unlicensed works (not mags) that are ambiguously canon.—spookywillowwtalk 22:59, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:44, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- I do believe its the standard now onward to be using {{UnlicensedStatus}} as a citation to specifically denote those unlicensed magazines as "non-canon" with respect to Legends, as there are still other unlicensed works (not mags) that are ambiguously canon.—spookywillowwtalk 22:59, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- Managed to find the article myself and have filled in the various redlinks and BTS as needed. Thanks for the heads up! Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
StarWarsFan
Is Barabel supposed to be plural? I noticed on the species' page, it says the plural Barabels, but here you used the singular.-StarWarsFan327 (talk) 21:59, 17 September 2025 (UTC)- Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:44, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 14:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)