Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Providence-class Carrier

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Providence-class Carrier

• Nominated by: Loqiical (talk) 05:55, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Durge's Lance and Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Fantasy Flight Games

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
2. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 16:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
3. —spookywilloww^talk 23:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
4. Samonic (Talk) 13:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
5. Fan26 (Talk) 02:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Object

Erebus

• The carrier looks like it was in its skies more than the atmosphere
  • The sky is part of the atmosphere, I guess. Should I change the word to sky and link to atmosphere? Loqiical (talk) 00:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Actually, never mind.
• Engines are creveld-4 radial ion drives.
  • Am I allowed to say this when the two models are not exactly the same thing and the source does not specify? Loqiical (talk) 00:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Added engine reference. Loqiical (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
• Specifications are missing per Star Wars Complete Vehicles, New Edition. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 17:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Same as above. Loqiical (talk) 00:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Added bridge and conning tower reference. Loqiical (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
      • Still some missing per Invincible. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 05:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
        • To which are you referring? For example, I can't really see 102 proton torpedo launchers, neither on the Invincible nor in this ship's image. Loqiical (talk) 06:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
          • The masts. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 17:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
            • Done, but I'm not sure whether the source says that the sensor and communication mast is one type of mast (since there is only one arrow), or that there are some sensor masts and some communication masts. Loqiical (talk) 03:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
            • Or we could just say "equipped" in the infobox. Loqiical (talk) 12:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
              • This is fine. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 16:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Fan

• "During the conflict" mentioning again that it was during the Clone Wars would work better
• "were in flight nearby.[1]" "flew nearby" would be better
• "were also found across the carrier's hull" Saying they were found on implies someone IU was looking and found them there. Given that we're describing the carrier from an OOU perspective, saying they were "located across" is preferable. Fan26 (Talk) 17:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
  • All done. Loqiical (talk) 22:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• "Line" versus "model" and what features are allowed to be stated in common should be discussed at some point in the future. Loqiical (talk) 04:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 02:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)