Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Pich

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Pich

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 16:46, November 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:BB5

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:57, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Menkooroo (talk) 13:21, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

Object

  1. Exiled Jedi
    • Please add the appropriate categories for unidentified gender and unidentified species.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:29, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
      • Added. 501st dogma(talk) 16:22, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
    • Could you make it clearer why the last sentence of the BTS is true? Is it due to player choice?--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 21:31, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
      • Better? 501st dogma(talk) 22:05, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
  2. !
    • I think "The Capture of Coh Veshiv" should be an RPG adventure in the "Appearances" section. Menkooroo (talk) 10:34, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
      • You sure? I've been handling the adventures as though they were a part of the source. I'll go around and change them all if you want. 501st dogma(talk) 01:23, December 7, 2012 (UTC)
        • There seems to be a lot of precedent for it. Cav treats all of the Darkstryder RPG adventures as Appearances, and they're the same thing as these ones. The Layout Guide names "roleplaying adventures" as Appearances rather than sources. Menkooroo (talk) 01:25, December 7, 2012 (UTC)
          • Guess I'll change it tomorrow then. 501st dogma(talk) 01:31, December 7, 2012 (UTC)
            • There you go. 501st dogma(talk) 13:13, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
              • Probably should fix this myself, but since you have a few articles that use it and will probably have many more in the future: The name of the RPG adventure should come first and the sourcebook second, like here. Menkooroo (talk) 10:09, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
                • Didn't even see this objection, and coincidentally fixed them all! There you go. 501st dogma(talk) 21:42, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
                  • One last thing: The article should source the adventure as a reference rather than the sourcebook. Menkooroo (talk) 02:43, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
                    • Done. 501st dogma(talk) 12:21, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments