- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
One-Eye
- Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:17, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: First in a string of Dark Forces II multiplayer characters. Ambig due to multiplayer only appearances.
(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:10, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:14, November 28, 2013 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 20:39, December 1, 2013 (UTC)
501st dogma(talk) 21:54, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
Object
- Ayrehead
I think we could probably add a nickname tag?Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:18, November 22, 2013 (UTC)- While it does seem obvious, I'm still not entirely sure if it should be. Clearly the name derives from his Cyber-Eye. But, for all we know, he was born as such, given a cruel name, and later got a cyber-eye. Sure that's completely speculative, but not anymore than assuming "One-Eye" is a nickname as opposed to a legal name (Granted, I have no idea how "legal" names work in SW). I kind of avoided such for all of the multiplayer characters, because honestly who knows.
- I guess if it's the official name the game gives him then you right I am making assumptions. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:08, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
- While it does seem obvious, I'm still not entirely sure if it should be. Clearly the name derives from his Cyber-Eye. But, for all we know, he was born as such, given a cruel name, and later got a cyber-eye. Sure that's completely speculative, but not anymore than assuming "One-Eye" is a nickname as opposed to a legal name (Granted, I have no idea how "legal" names work in SW). I kind of avoided such for all of the multiplayer characters, because honestly who knows.
Is there not any kind of time period the multiplayer is associated with? I would just put it as the same time period as the main game.Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:18, November 22, 2013 (UTC)- Mmm, makes sense I suppose. Done. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:39, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
You still need to add the time period to the body somewhere and the infobox.Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:08, November 23, 2013 (UTC)- Whoops! How about that? The dates are the dates of the two games. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:13, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
To be honest I'm not sure you need the precise dates, just saying during the reign of the New Republic is enough. The dates currently make it sound like he only was active in those five years but we don't know that.Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:03, November 23, 2013 (UTC)- How's that then? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:04, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Whoops! How about that? The dates are the dates of the two games. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:13, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Mmm, makes sense I suppose. Done. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:39, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Preem
Can you change the end of the first sentence a bit? Something like "during the time of the New Republic"?- How does it sound now?
At the end of the Bts, can you change the word disputed to not known or some variation? I wouldn't really call his status disputed, more unknown.- True, so I guess I was thinking like 'Some say he's Canon' some say 'He's not Canon', so I dunno. Unknown then. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:50, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Nice work. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:48, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Exiled Jedi
You need to source the eras field in the infobox.- Ok
You need to include all the information from the infobox in the main article.--Exiled Jedi(Greetings) 01:19, November 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Whoops, consider it done! --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:31, December 1, 2013 (UTC)
Comments