- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Masanya
- Nominated by: GethralkinHyperwave 15:15, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Expanding game-referenced articles.
(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
Object
- 501
First of all, you have quite a few redirects. Please get rid of these. If you go to your preferences, and then go into gadgets there is an option to trun all redirects orange. This will help you find them.- Done. Thanks for that tip. —GethralkinHyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
You have to mention everything mentioned in the intro and the infobox (besides the eras) in the body of the text. Right now, there is a bit missing, including the fact that it is a CR90.- Fixed. Let me know if I missed anything. —GethralkinHyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Please note that you can link to an article three times: Once in the infobox, once in the intro, and once in the rest of the body. There are some things that you can link to in the body.
- Okay, I think that should fix it. Let me know. —GethralkinHyperwave 02:34, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Please note that you can link to an article three times: Once in the infobox, once in the intro, and once in the rest of the body. There are some things that you can link to in the body.
- Fixed. Let me know if I missed anything. —GethralkinHyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
I think the BtS could be expanded. You should mention where it first appeared and it's other appearance.- Done. —GethralkinHyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Fix these, and I will continue my review. Good job. 501st dogma(talk) 21:56, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Currently, we are at 300 or so words, whcih means it can't be a GAN. Do you want me to finish my review before we move it to the GAN page? 501st dogma(talk) 00:28, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, please. It would be nice to have everything tidied up so that the GAN can pass muster quickly. —GethralkinHyperwave 22:23, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
The intro has two "during"s in it. Change it to one please.- Done. —GethralkinHyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
- No we have two "fought"s.
- Got it. Thanks. —GethralkinHyperwave 15:12, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
- No we have two "fought"s.
- Done. —GethralkinHyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
Context for Galactic Civil War in the History. Also, could you clarify that the Battle at Endor was between the Empire and the Rebels?- Done. —GethralkinHyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
- It looks good, though it is quite long for a context. I have no problem with it's length, but I don't think we can source the context of the War to cards list as it is now. Reffing that context would eliminate that problem. 501st dogma(talk) 21:35, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
- How's that? —GethralkinHyperwave 15:07, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
- It looks good, though it is quite long for a context. I have no problem with it's length, but I don't think we can source the context of the War to cards list as it is now. Reffing that context would eliminate that problem. 501st dogma(talk) 21:35, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Done. —GethralkinHyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
Does Empire at War have any info for the article, or is it just mentioned?- Done. —GethralkinHyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good otherwise. 501st dogma(talk) 23:34, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
- You've addressed all of my objections, so I will archive it tonight when I get the chance. 501st dogma(talk) 20:51, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
Comments