Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Marsune and Gallo

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Marsune and Gallo

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote 501st dogma(talk) 01:13, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Stake black msg 11:31, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Winterz (talk) 04:36, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 00:15, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ECvote—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 02:53, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Object

  1. Slow-roasted at the stake
    • Context on Naboo
      • I've said its a planet, what other context is needed?
        • Is it a Core World, a Mid Rim planet, or what? Don't forget to adequately source it.
    • Perhaps you could explain a little more about the unification of the Gungan tribes (why were they split? how did that achieve peace for Naboo?)
      • No info is given on why the tribes were split other than that they were fighting each other, so I can't put that in, put does saying that they ended a war help with the other one?
    • You could probably mention that the game was played (but not necessarily exclusively) in the swamps and forests of Naboo
      • Done
    • You can beef up that BtS, for sure. Tell us very briefly what SW:GB is about, and, more importantly state the name of the expansion pack.
      • What Stake said here. Pipelinking should be avoided in most cases, especially when the pipelinked articles have official names and are of significant relevance to the article at hand, like in this case. Winterz (talk) 23:23, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
        • Damn, I've been doing this in all my other GB noms... Well, I have some work to do. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 07:02, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
          • A lot better. But I'm a little confused, what story are you referring to in the BtS? Stake black msg 14:08, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
    • I think that's it, but good job overall. Stake black msg 21:40, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Say you, say me
    • The "Mentioned in databank" should have an additional "only" to clarify that it only appeared there.
      • Done.
        • Also remember the "first mentioned".
    • You must get rid of the quote, as it isn't quoted from in-universe material.
      • It's in the Bts, so it's okay.
        • Alrighty, let's just start small to solve this then. The rules are explicit about not allowing (most of the times) OOU quotes, however there are exceptions. Can you tell me how the databank presents itself? Is it ingame? Is it IU?
          • The databank is definitely in-universe. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 08:05, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
            • Then it will even be more complicated. If it's in-universe, you must write in the "main" body that it was mentioned in a (or the)databank. Also specify that it is IU in the Bts section. As for the databank itself, can you tell me how it is? You access in intros or by pressing a key and it pops up or is it accessable through a console inside the storyline gameplay? Winterz (talk) 17:05, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
            • Sorry, by in universe I just meant it takes an in-universe perspective, but it isn't shown to be found by anyone at some point or something like that. In GB you access the databank just by clicking on it in the start menu. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 00:59, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
              • Well then if it's not IU, then it is OOU and the rules are explicit about OOU quotes so I return to my initial point, you need to remove it. I've also run a check on GB articles with status and also TFU (because of the similar Databank system) and none of them uses databank's quotes. Winterz (talk) 16:35, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
    • Also, careful with the verb conjugation in the Bts, it still should be past tense. Winterz (talk) 23:23, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
      • I thought we were allowed to right Bts's in present tense, could you point me to where this rule is written? Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 07:02, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
        • It's logical. The subject was mentioned, it is not being mentioned as the entry is not ongoing work anymore is it, sir? Published work is past. ;) Winterz (talk) 12:24, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Exiled Jedi

Comments

  • Not sure if the quote marks in the Bts should be there or not, but the GB databank only writes this with the quotation marks, so I've wound up putting them there. Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 05:56, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
    • That sounds okay and fine. 501st dogma(talk) 01:13, February 27, 2013 (UTC)