Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Logray's ceremonial wand

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Logray's ceremonial wand

• Nominated by: --LelalMekha 20:08, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Why not?

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

1. 221 words at my count, under the limit. Good work, 501st dogma^(talk) 00:19, June 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object

1. 500th
   • History needs to be expanded. You will need to mention all intro exlusive stuff in it.
     • Fixed... I guess. --LelalMekha 00:16, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
   • Link for Latara's flute.
     • Done. --LelalMekha 00:16, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
   • Good work. 501st dogma^(talk) 00:00, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. Logray!
   • The image seems to have a thin line of whitespace at the bottom. Can you get rid of it and re-upload it?
     • Fixed. --LelalMekha 09:07, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
   • Be sure to use the {{Conjecture}} tag at the top of the article.
     • The name's no conjecture. It is specifically called that way in The Shadow Stone: An Ewok Adventure. --LelalMekha 09:07, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
       • Ah, cool. In that case, the full name "Logray's ceremonial wand" should be used in both the intro and the body.
   • Since the body of the article needs to re-establish everything that the intro has established, "Characteristics" probably shouldn't open with "the" ceremonial wand. It needs to introduce everything anew, and using "the" makes it seem like it's already been introduced.
     • Fixed. (If it's all right with you this way.) --LelalMekha 09:07, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
   • I think the intro could stand to be a bit longer. There are some pretty important events in "History" that could be mentioned --- specifically, the wand breaking.
     • Done. (But I didn't want to make it way longer either.) --LelalMekha 09:07, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
   • Reload your infobox. Some additional fields should be filled in, such as |destroyed, |owners, |culture, etc. You could probably give some approximations of the length and width, even if it's just something like "approximately the size of an Ewok's arm." That info should make its way into the body of the article, too. Menkooroo 00:51, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
     • Fixed... But now it's too long to be a CA... --LelalMekha 09:07, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
       • Nothing wrong with that! :) Do you know how to archive it? If not, I can do it, so that you can bring it to the GAN page. Menkooroo 14:45, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
         • Can't say I'm familiar with the procedure. --LelalMekha 18:08, June 10, 2012 (UTC)

Comments