- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
LRC-274
- Nominated by: ThePedantry (talk) 20:01, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- Date Archived: 11:59, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Final word count: 161 words (0 introduction, 65 body, 96 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 106 words (0 introduction, 27 body, 79 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games
(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support votes
Lewisr (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2025 (UTC)- —spookywillowwtalk 11:31, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- StarWarsFan327 (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Mor9347
(Talk) 15:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC) - D MCCG
(chat) 20:16, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Objections
spookly
Would Category:Officers of the Galactic Empire not be a more specific category? As the general Imperial officers category has that as a subcat, but also refers to the officers of several other Empires (mostly Legends ones).—spookywillowwtalk 01:17, 12 August 2025 (UTC)- Fixed ThePedantry (talk) 02:33, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Lew
Per the layout guide: "Organizations in any character infobox that are inherently implied by a stated role (examples: Imperial Officer Corps does not need to be linked in the article body if the article states that the subject is an Imperial officer" so in this case I'd say it was maybe better to say that LRC is an Imperial officer in the body portionLewisr (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2025 (UTC)- Updated. ThePedantry (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
The quote should be prosifiedLewisr (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2025 (UTC)- Can you clarify what you mean by "prosified". I did add the missing fullstop if that's what you meant. ThePedantry (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- As in like documenting the contents of the quote, so like That year, LRC did so and so and reported to so and so Lewisr (talk) 22:24, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- I added the context of the quote in a game mechanics template but I might look at adding a new message option to the template since I'm not describing it as 100% completion is accurate in this case as you can 100% the game and not received most wanted level messages. ThePedantry (talk) 04:18, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Switched the GameMechanics to use the optional path message to surround the context of the quote. I think that and the added context in the BTS should explain this case. ThePedantry (talk) 04:00, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- As in like documenting the contents of the quote, so like That year, LRC did so and so and reported to so and so Lewisr (talk) 22:24, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Can you clarify what you mean by "prosified". I did add the missing fullstop if that's what you meant. ThePedantry (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
If I'm understanding, the specific spelling of LRC-274 isn't confirmed?Lewisr (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2025 (UTC)- The spelling is confirmed in the subtitles. I removed the line about they subtitles identifying them as simply "Imperial officer" as that is what the subtitles list in the name section of the subtitles; as "Imperial officer: Command, I've got a criminal in sight." ThePedantry (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 11:56, 1 September 2025 (UTC)