- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Klee-klee nut
- Nominated by: Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 21:06, March 3, 2013 (UTC) - Nomination comments: Sometimes you feel like a nut...
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
Now I've got this old recorder song from primary school stuck in my head... Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 21:16, March 3, 2013 (UTC)- 501st dogma(talk) 21:29, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
Winterz (talk) 14:18, March 6, 2013 (UTC)- Can I claim this for project novels? :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:52, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Sure, go ahead.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 22:36, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Sure, go ahead.--Exiled Jedi
Object
- CC-8
Offee is used twice in one sentence, change one of them to avoid repetition.Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 21:11, March 3, 2013 (UTC)- Thanks for the catch, fixed.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 21:13, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
- That was quick :P Commander Code-8 G'day, mate 21:16, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the catch, fixed.--Exiled Jedi
One thing: "during a battle between the..." It sounds like she was fighting, and then smelled the nuts. Could you change this so it explains that she was not fighting at the time.501st dogma(talk) 21:37, March 3, 2013 (UTC)- Any better? The battle was taking place, but she was just in her quarters.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 23:29, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Any better? The battle was taking place, but she was just in her quarters.--Exiled Jedi
- Winterz
You should probably mention the larger conflict between the CIS and Republic (could be done in that start).Winterz (talk) 17:43, March 5, 2013 (UTC)- Oops, added.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 22:49, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Oops, added.--Exiled Jedi
- — DigiFluid(Whine here) 19:26, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
I know it's nice to have a BTS section and all, but in this case it seems completely redundant.- It isn't redundant, as it tells us when the thing was mentioned. Additionally, all CANs require a BTS. 501st dogma(talk) 22:09, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Struck because it's a requirement for CAN, but I still think it's stupid to include a BTS that says exactly the same thing as the Appearances directly below. — DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:26, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Well sir, the Bts requirement was something established by community consensus, it's not really EJ or one's choice. Regardless, if you look closely there are some important differences between those sections ("year" for instance). Will you not lay your support vote? It's what is missing for this nomination to pass and you seem to be holding it simply because of something that wasn't really EJ's fault ;). Winterz (talk) 19:59, March 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Struck because it's a requirement for CAN, but I still think it's stupid to include a BTS that says exactly the same thing as the Appearances directly below. — DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:26, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
- It isn't redundant, as it tells us when the thing was mentioned. Additionally, all CANs require a BTS. 501st dogma(talk) 22:09, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments