- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Jey Parks
- Nominated by: Immi Thrax
(talk) 07:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC) - Nomination comments:
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:PRIDE
(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- Dentface (talk) 15:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Nice work. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 21:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)- Fan26 (Talk) 19:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- LucaRoR
(Talk) 05:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC) - đłď¸âđ â YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- OOM 224 16:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Object
Dentface
Maybe an introductory quote? Just glancing at the source for your quote in the body, it looks like Parks was quoted a decent amount. Also, please take note of my copy edit.Dentface (talk) 13:52, 23 September 2021 (UTC)- I added one, let me know if it's suitable. Note taken... I think! Immi Thrax (talk) 14:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- I added one, let me know if it's suitable. Note taken... I think! Immi Thrax
Fan
Would that image of kneesa kicking imperial butt work in her Bio?Fan26 (Talk) 02:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)- Not sure if it works, but have a look. Immi Thrax (talk) 02:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure if it works, but have a look. Immi Thrax
Macaroni
Yay for Kneesaa! That intro is too short, though.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)- Yay for Kneesaa! Is it sufficient now? Immi Thrax (talk) 05:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yup. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 21:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yay for Kneesaa! Is it sufficient now? Immi Thrax
OOM
I'd say the duplicate link rule, in terms of links present in the article as a whole, should apply to the "Published works" section with only the exception of work titles and years. In other words, I think there's no need for those links in the notes cell.- Removed those links--good ol' figuring-out-precedents-for-real-people-articles!
Could use an imagecat for this image of her. (I realise this could pose a problem if the mediacat stays for whatever reason, since there's the competing "images by" cat, and especially for other articles where there's multiple images by/of the person, but that could be fixed with an added field to the mediacat template if and when that happens)OOM 224 21:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)- To clarify... your objection is that you'd like to have new a single-image category "Images of Jenny Parks" created as a subject category, in addition to the existing single-image category "Images by Jenny Parks" as an artist category? (If so, I disagree.) Immi Thrax (talk) 16:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- To clarify... your objection is that you'd like to have new a single-image category "Images of Jenny Parks" created as a subject category, in addition to the existing single-image category "Images by Jenny Parks" as an artist category? (If so, I disagree.) Immi Thrax
Comments
- Although she has an image category, she only has one image. Do I keep the Mediacat template for a single image?
- I would say yes. Fan26 (Talk) 02:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Seconded. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 21:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Imagecat template should go, per recent CA/GA precedence: Kowakian crumb cake, Jerus Jannick, and Corrupter OOM 224 20:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- As for the reasoning, since the article here already features that one image listed in the category, it's more or less what Imp said for those first two articles I've linked: "the reader sees the imagecat link, which implicitly says "click here to see all images of this Canon subject" and then the category is all "lol nope there's only that one image"" OOM 224 20:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see an issue linking it since the category does exist, and it doesn't have an image that doesn't pertain to the article subject like Jannick would, but I'm fine either way. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 03:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- I rather dislike having it since it only contains the image that's already on the article itself. (Thought you'd get to see more Jenny Parks art? NOPE, just the same one!) This nomination has now been brought up in Forum:CT:Single-image categories, apparently as something about to set a precedent, and I don't know if the EC will put a hold on this nom because of that CT, or if the EC would approve the nom if I remove the mediacat. Please advise! Immi Thrax (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Nah, that CT doesn't affect this nom, per my comments there. In the interest of keeping the nom going, I'd say you can decide whether that mediacat should be removed as the nominator, and then we could have a discussion on the issue sometime later. OOM 224 20:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- In that case, as nominator, I've removed the mediacat, and I'll check the CTs. Immi Thrax (talk) 16:39, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Slight oversight with how that CT affects this nom, but we should be fine now :P OOM 224 22:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- In that case, as nominator, I've removed the mediacat, and I'll check the CTs. Immi Thrax
- Nah, that CT doesn't affect this nom, per my comments there. In the interest of keeping the nom going, I'd say you can decide whether that mediacat should be removed as the nominator, and then we could have a discussion on the issue sometime later. OOM 224 20:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 16:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)