Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Immortal gods of the Sith/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Immortal gods of the Sith

  • Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 17:34, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: There really aren't many things to say about those guys, sadly.

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Good wrok. 501st dogma(talk) 13:53, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
  2. They need to tell a story about these guys! Plagueis327 (talk) 23:36, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
  3. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 15:20, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Menkooroo (talk) 22:50, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ECvote —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 14:16, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:27, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object

  1. Could you give context for the Galactic Civil War and the Death Star? Otherwise, good work. 501st dogma(talk) 11:16, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Really handy to know for CANs: Add the code __NOTOC__ at the top of the page to hide the table of contents. Menkooroo (talk) 04:31, July 30, 2012 (UTC)
    • I can't, in good conscience, let the article fail over something so minor. Fixed. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 15:20, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
      • I'll remember that in the future. I confess I dind't even know of this NOTOC code, otherwise I would have added it. Thanks for pointing out. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:33, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
  3. A couple more: The infobox says that the immortal gods of the Sith are associated with Sith beliefs, but the in-universe portion of the article itself doesn't really explicitly say this. Can you spell this out in the article? Adding a few words to the first sentence would probably do the trick.
    • Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:43, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
      • Normally I'd fix this myself, but since you're online, check the spelling of "worshipped."
  4. Sith Order (linked to in the infobox) is a disambiguation page. Per the text at the bottom of disambig pages, they shouldn't be linked to. I recommend linking to something else or just removing the link entirely. Menkooroo (talk) 19:37, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Fixed, though I'm not sure it is necessary to link "Sith" a second time. I might simply remove it as you suggested. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:43, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
      • You're right; things should only be linked to once in the infobox. Menkooroo (talk) 19:50, August 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments