Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Huwhaka revolt

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Huwhaka revolt

  • Nominated by: Tinwe(comlink) 14:31, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Adventure. Heh! Excitement. Heh! A Jedi craves not these things.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 22:45, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  2. ECvote—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 00:16, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

Object

  1. Among the combatants were the reformed Black Knights, a dark side faction: dark side of what? Clone Commander Lee Talk 14:36, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
    • Changed to "a faction of dark side Force-users." Hope that's clearer. Tinwe(comlink) 15:02, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Jujiggum
    • First sentence is a bit redundant.
      • Trimmed.
    • "…who had been destroyed by the Jedi…" Seeing as this is immediately followed by a reference to their many returns, perhaps "defeated" would be better than "destroyed" here.
      • I suppose you're right. Changed.
    • Just to verify: there is no conclusion presented for the conflict? No mention as to the Jedi winning/being successful (even if it doesn't say whether the Black Knights were eradicated)?
    • And also just to verify: there's nothing on the origin of the name "Huwhaka," is there? Nothing to connect it to the Black Knights or that grants it as a place name, or anything like that?
      • No and no, to both questions. Be assured, if such info could have been gleaned from The Jedi Path, I would have done it. :) Actually the opening quote of the article is all the book has to say about the revolt. I guess you could take Yoda's mention of "adventure" as a sign that the Jedi were successful, but that might be reading too much into it. Tinwe(comlink) 20:31, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
        • Cool, I just feel obligated to check. :) I'm not going to make an objection out of it, but it might be worth a BTS note to say that the source doesn't actually mention the outcome of the revolt. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 22:45, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
          • Good idea, I've done that. Thanks for the review! Tinwe(comlink) 11:55, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
    • Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:56, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments