Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Green/Aura

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Green/Aura

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Apparently there isn't a code for that, yet. :/ Winterz (talk) 18:56, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
  2. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 23:41, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:09, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:10, December 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object

  1. Winterz
    • Is there any way to remove the "< Green"? Considering that the Green article isn't related to these ones.
      • I have no idea how to remove it. I noticed it when I first created the article, but did not know how to eliminate it.
        • I'll leave the question at Darth Culator's talkpage, will sign my support once I have a reply. ;)
    • Context on Sienar Fleet Systems.
      • Contextified.
        • Lol, I was expecting some more specific context like "a subsidiary of the massive company X", not just two obvious words. Winterz (talk) 18:48, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
          • Does that satisfy your objection? 501st dogma(talk) 12:31, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
            • Meh, I guess so. Winterz (talk) 13:09, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
    • (objections apply to both 'Aurabesh') Winterz (talk) 14:43, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
      • Both articles have been upadated according to your objections. Thanks for the review(s). 501st dogma(talk) 18:17, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Exiled Jedi
    • Could you mention the 0 ABY date in this article.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 22:30, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
      • Added. 501st dogma(talk) 12:16, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments