Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Fusion Flame

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Fusion Flame

• Nominated by: NaruHina ^Talk 16:11, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Millennium Falcon is ten times better than all of LOTF and I'm not a hundred pages into it.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

1. 501st dogma^(talk) 22:03, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
2. Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 13:53, September 19, 2012 (UTC)
3. Tinwe^(comlink) 07:35, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
4. Naru, as I guess you like to have someone reviewing your noms, so should you do to others. Anyway, good work! Winterz (talk) 13:31, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Object

1. 501
   • Source end of body.
     • Fixed, by the way. NaruHina ^Talk 21:29, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
   • You don't mention the Falcon by it's real name any where in the body, even though you refer to "that name". Fix this.
     • Stellar Envoy is its real name from that time. Unless you'd have us call Leia "Leia Organa Solo" in an article set in 0 BBY. "That name" refers to the Envoy name and that it will be given that name after the race with the Fusion Flame is mentioned. …It's timey wimey. NaruHina ^Talk 20:36, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
       • Then what name is this referring to: "In 18 BBY, the ship that had beaten the Fusion Flame, by then given that name,...."? I assume you meant to put to Falcon's name here and then forgot. 21:16, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
         • The subject of the sentence bolded: "In 18 BBY, the ship that had beaten the Fusion Flame, by then [named the Stellar Envoy]…". This is set up by "It once raced another ship, later called the Stellar Envoy…" two sentences before. It had not been named Stellar Envoy when they raced and, by 18 BBY, it had been. I changed it preliminarily to say Stellar Envoy there, but I think it's clunky. See what you think. NaruHina ^Talk 21:29, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
           • At a glance, it looks good. However, on the topic of the Falcon, you have the pilot of the Falcon, not the Stellar Envoy, saying the quote. 501st dogma^(talk) 21:40, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
             • Now that's a mistake. Fixed. NaruHina ^Talk 21:42, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
   • 501st dogma^(talk) 20:21, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

• No, there should not be an article on the Falcon's pilot at the time of the race. The scene is far too ambiguous. The entries could have been from any of the pilots we know about or none or multiple entries could have come from the same pilot and therefore there's no benefit to having "Unidentified Millennium Falcon pilot 1–6". NaruHina ^Talk 16:11, September 10, 2012 (UTC)