Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Fighter's Courage

< Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Fighter's Courage

  • Nominated by: OLIOSTER (talk) 18:45, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I'm not even close to done with SWG's paintings and posters.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Paintings are awesome! Hanzo Hasashi 15:31, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Darth Morrt 13:29, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ECvote ~ SavageBob 04:00, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 23:06, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

  1. How do we know she's female? ~ SavageBob 23:36, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
    • Based on what female Trandoshans look like in the game. Can be seen here. OLIOSTER (talk) 03:19, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
      • They look the same to me anatomically; do the female ones have breasts or something that I'm missing? In other words, the figure in the painting could be wearing something akin to a gender-neutral Jedi robe, right? ~ SavageBob 17:13, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
        • It may not be readily apparent, but I assure you this is a female Trandoshan. It is just a reuse of concept art from the development of the game for female Trandoshans. Can be seen here and here. If this is not enough, I will remove it. OLIOSTER (talk) 20:03, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
          • In that case, if you can provide a footnote that explains why this individual is being called female, I'm fine with it. Has that concept art been printed anywhere official? That would do. ~ SavageBob 17:08, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
            • Unfortunately not. Just went ahead and removed it. OLIOSTER (talk) 23:54, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
              • OK, last question, and I'll drop it: Based on playing the game, do you think it's fair to duck test the Trandoshan in the image as female? I don't want to remove verifiable information if it's there... ~ SavageBob 02:34, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
              • Absolutely. OLIOSTER (talk) 03:07, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
                • OK, sorry for the runaround. I'd feel more comfortable with a source on the gender, but if you feel it's a duck test, I'm willing to go with that. ~ SavageBob 04:00, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Again, my description reads pretty flat. Any help would be appreciated. OLIOSTER (talk) 18:52, March 24, 2011 (UTC)