- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Esu Rotsino
- Nominated by: Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 23:56, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Another non-GB nom! Also a quick barn-burner inclusion, and sort of cheating since its 2013 down here :P
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
501st dogma(talk) 20:13, January 1, 2013 (UTC)- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 20:34, January 1, 2013 (UTC) - Stake black msg 20:13, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
Menkooroo (talk) 04:36, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
Object
I always recommend against using "formerly" next to affiliations in infoboxes, as infoboxes are supposed to represent an individual's entire life rather than be a snapshot of the moment in time that the individual appeared in canon. For instance, Imperial defectors to the Alliance who then go on to serve the New Republic generally don't get a "formerly" next to anything. Make sense?Menkooroo (talk) 04:35, January 2, 2013 (UTC)- That was already in the article when I started working on it, and I forgot about it. I normally don't use formerly in my articles either. Should I change it to defected or something? Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 22:09, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- My advice would be to not include any disclaimer at all. Simply listing the various affiliations from throughout her life is, I think, the best way to go about it. Menkooroo (talk) 15:42, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
- It is done. Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 21:30, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
- My advice would be to not include any disclaimer at all. Simply listing the various affiliations from throughout her life is, I think, the best way to go about it. Menkooroo (talk) 15:42, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
- That was already in the article when I started working on it, and I forgot about it. I normally don't use formerly in my articles either. Should I change it to defected or something? Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 22:09, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- Is Article of Secession supposed to be capitalized, because the body has it capitalized, while the quote attribution has it not so. 501st dogma(talk) 00:49, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- It's meant to be in caps, but I just typed it wrong. Anyway, done now. Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 06:52, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- This one's got me puzzled. Should the information about the name being an anagram on Sue Rostoni be sourced? It may appear self-evident, but this is very close to crossing the OR line. Stake black msg 20:01, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
- It doesn't need to be sourced since you the reader can see that the same letters are in each, which is the definition of an anagram. It would original research if the article claimed that the anagram was intentional, (which is almost certainly was) without sourcing it.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 20:09, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Fair point. Stake black msg 20:13, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
- It doesn't need to be sourced since you the reader can see that the same letters are in each, which is the definition of an anagram. It would original research if the article claimed that the anagram was intentional, (which is almost certainly was) without sourcing it.--Exiled Jedi