- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Caf bean
- Nominated by: Eyrezer 13:37, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Reviewing this will keep you awake all night
(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
- I've been awake for the past thirty-six hours... damn you! Menkooroo 04:34, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 00:46, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 09:26, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Object
I think that reference #6 should be broken up into three references --- multiple refs are surely better form than one big super ref.Menkooroo 15:57, September 29, 2010 (UTC)- Incorporating them into one ref is tidier in the body of the text, and in this case, there is no ambiguity over where a particular piece of information comes from that might otherwise occur by incorporating several source into a reference. Therefore, it seems there is a pro but no con to doing it the present way. --Eyrezer 01:23, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
Comments